Supreme Court of the United States

Today at the Court - Sunday, Jan 26, 2025


  • The Supreme Court Building is closed on weekends and federal holidays.
  • Courtroom Lectures available within the next 30 days.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<<January 2025><<
January 2025
SMTWTFS
   
 
234
56789
 
11
12131415161718
19
 
2122232425
262728293031 
       
Calendar Info/Key

 


Oral Arguments

Week of Monday, January 20


Tuesday, January 21
       
FDA v. R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co. (23-1187)
       
McLaughlin Chiropractic Assoc. v. McKesson Corp. (23-1226)

Wednesday, January 22
       
Barnes v. Felix (23-1239)
       
Cunningham v. Cornell University (23-1007)

 

The audio recordings and transcripts of all oral arguments heard by the Supreme Court of the United States are posted on this website on the same day an argument is heard by the Court. Same-day transcripts are considered official but subject to final review.


Earlier Transcripts | Earlier Audio

Recent Decisions


January 21, 2025
       
Andrew v. White (23-6573) (Per Curiam)
At the time of the decision of the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals, clearly established federal law provided that the erroneous admission of unduly prejudicial evidence could render a criminal trial fundamentally unfair in violation of due process, see Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U. S. 808, 825 (1991); the judgment below is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings.



January 17, 2025
         
TikTok Inc. v. Garland (24-656) (Per Curiam)
The challenged provisions of the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, 138 Stat. 955, do not violate petitioners’ First Amendment rights.



January 15, 2025
         
E.M.D. Sales, Inc. v. Carrera (23-217)
The preponderance-of-the-evidence standard applies when an employer seeks to demonstrate that an employee is exempt from the minimum-wage and overtime-pay provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

         
Royal Canin U. S. A. v. Wullschleger (23-677)
When a plaintiff amends her complaint to delete the federal-law claims that enabled removal to federal court, leaving only state-law claims behind, the federal court loses supplemental jurisdiction over the state claims, and the case must be remanded to state court.



More Opinions...

Did You Know...

An Ink-quiry


Archives reveal monumental and mundane materials alike. In a January 1919 note to the Court’s Marshal, Frank Green, Justice Mahlon Pitney expressed concern over the quality of his ink. He wrote, “There is something wrong with my ink. Please observe how it works.” While the natural fading of ink over time leaves some doubt as to exactly what Justice Pitney was referring, he utilized plenty of ink to write 244 majority opinions during his tenure from 1912 to 1922.

 

1 / 2
Portrait of Justice Mahlon Pitney by Adrian Lamb, after Ellis Roberts, 1968.
Portrait of Justice Mahlon Pitney by Adrian Lamb, after Ellis Roberts, 1968.
Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States
Click on the arrows or dots to see the next photograph.
2 / 2
Notes from Justice Pitney to Marshal Frank Green regarding his ink.
Notes from Justice Pitney to Marshal Frank Green regarding his ink.
Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States
Click on the arrows or dots to see the first photograph.
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 1 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20543