Docket for 23A384
|
| Oct 26 2023 | Application (23A384) for a stay, submitted to The Chief Justice. | | Main DocumentOther | | Oct 31 2023 | Response to application (23A384) requested by The Chief Justice, due by 4 p.m. (EDT) on November 2, 2023. | | | | Nov 02 2023 | Response to application from respondent Environmental Protection Agency filed. | | Proof of ServiceMain Document | | Nov 02 2023 | Response to application from respondents New York, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, and District of Columbia, City of New York, and Harris County, TX filed. | | Main DocumentProof of Service | | Nov 02 2023 | Response to application from respondent Environmental Defense Fund filed. | | Main DocumentProof of Service | | Nov 03 2023 | Reply of applicant United States Steel Corporation filed. | | ReplyProof of Service | | Dec 20 2023 | Application (23A384) referred to the Court. | | | | Dec 20 2023 | Consideration of the applications for stay (23A349, 23A350, 23A351, and 23A384) presented to The Chief Justice and by him referred to the Court is deferred pending oral argument. The applications are consolidated, and a total of 1 hour is allotted for oral argument. The applications will be set for argument in the February 2024 argument session. Arguing counsel should be prepared to address, among other issues related to the challenge based on the SIP disapprovals, whether the emissions controls imposed by the Rule are reasonable regardless of the number of States subject to the Rule. VIDED. | | | | Jan 05 2024 | SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, February 21, 2024. VIDED. | | | | Jan 05 2024 | Record requested from the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. | | | | Jan 08 2024 | Record received electronically from the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and available with the Clerk. | | | | Jan 09 2024 | Any motion regarding oral argument is due on or before Friday, January 12, 2024. VIDED. | | | | Jan 09 2024 | Motion for divided argument filed by the Solicitor General. VIDED. | | Main DocumentProof of Service | | Jan 10 2024 | Motion for divided argument filed by applicants. VIDED. | | Main Document | | Jan 22 2024 | Motion for divided argument filed by the Solicitor General GRANTED. VIDED. | | | | Jan 22 2024 | Motion for divided argument filed by applicants GRANTED. | | | | Jan 23 2024 | Letter of respondents Environmental Protection Agency, et al. notifying Court of proposed rule filed. VIDED. (Distributed) | | Main Document | | Feb 21 2024 | Argued. For state applicants: Mathura J. Sridharan, Deputy Solicitor General, Columbus, Ohio. For industry applicants: Catherine E. Stetson, Washington, D. C. For federal respondents: Malcolm L. Stewart, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For state respondents: Judith N. Vale, Deputy Solicitor General, New York, N. Y. VIDED. | | | | Mar 28 2024 | Letter of respondents EPA, et al. updating Court filed. VIDED. (Distributed) | | Main Document | | Jun 27 2024 | Applications for stay (23A349, 23A350, 23A351, and 23A384) granted by the Court. Gorsuch, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Thomas, Alito, and Kavanaugh, JJ., joined. Barrett, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson, JJ., joined. VIDED. | | |
|