Docket for 21A85
|
Oct 18 2021 | Application (21A85) to vacate stay, submitted to Justice Alito. | | Main DocumentProof of ServiceOther | Oct 18 2021 | Response to application (21A85) requested by Justice Alito, due Thursday, October 21, by noon ET. | | | Oct 18 2021 | Motion for leave to file amici brief and motion for leave to file brief in compliance with Rule 33.2 filed by Massachusetts, et al. | | Main DocumentOtherOther | Oct 18 2021 | Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Surgical Health Services, et al. | | Main DocumentProof of ServiceOtherProof of Service | Oct 19 2021 | Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Administrative Law, Constitutional Law, and Civil Procedure Scholars. | | Main DocumentProof of ServiceOther | Oct 19 2021 | Motion for leave to file amici brief and motion for leave to file brief in compliance with Rule 33.2 filed by Medical Organizations. | | Main DocumentOtherProof of Service | Oct 19 2021 | Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Constitutional Accountability Center. | | Main DocumentOtherProof of Service | Oct 19 2021 | Motion for leave to file amici curiae brief filed by Current and Former Prosecutors and Law Enforcement Leaders, et al. | | Main DocumentProof of ServiceOther | Oct 19 2021 | Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Legal Scholars Leah Litman, et al. | | Main DocumentProof of ServiceOther | Oct 20 2021 | Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Texas Medical Association. | | Main DocumentProof of ServiceOther | Oct 20 2021 | Motion for leave to file amici brief and motion for leave to file brief in compliance with Rule 33.2 filed by Human Coalition, et al. | | Main DocumentOtherProof of ServiceOther | Oct 21 2021 | Response to application from respondent Texas filed. | | Main DocumentProof of Service | Oct 21 2021 | Response to application from Erick Graham, et al. filed. | | Main Document | Oct 21 2021 | Motion for leave to file amici brief and motion for leave to file brief in compliance with Rule 33.2 filed by Indiana, et al. | | Main DocumentOtherProof of Service | Oct 22 2021 | Reply of applicant United States filed. | | ReplyProof of Service | Oct 22 2021 | Application (21A85) referred to the Court. | | | Oct 22 2021 | Consideration of the application (21A85) to vacate stay presented to Justice Alito and by him referred to the Court is deferred pending oral argument. The application is treated as a petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment (No. 21-588), and the petition is granted limited to the following question: May the United States bring suit in federal court and obtain injunctive or declaratory relief against the State, state court judges, state court clerks, other state officials, or all private parties to prohibit S.B. 8 from being enforced. The briefs of the parties in No. 21-588, limited to 13,000 words, are to be filed electronically on or before 5 p.m., Wednesday, October 27, 2021. Reply briefs, if any, limited to 6,000 words, are to be filed electronically on or before 5 p.m., Friday, October 29, 2021. Any amicus curiae briefs are to be filed electronically on or before 5 p.m., Wednesday, October 27, 2021. Booklet format briefs prepared in compliance with Rule 33.1 shall be submitted as soon as possible thereafter. The parties are not required to file a joint appendix. The case is set for oral argument on Monday, November 1, 2021. Justice Sotomayor, concurring in part and dissenting in part. (Detached opinion) | | | Oct 27 2021 | Main document of The Rogers Group not accepted for filing. (October 29, 2021) | | | Oct 28 2021 | Amicus of The Rogers Group not accepted for filing. (October 29, 2021) | | | Nov 01 2021 | 21-588 (21A85) Argued. For petitioner: Elizabeth B. Prelogar, Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For state respondent: Judd E. Stone, II, Solicitor General, Austin, Tex. For private respondents: Jonathan F. Mitchell, Austin, Tex. | | | Dec 10 2021 | The application to vacate stay presented to Justice Alito and by him referred to the Court is denied. Justice Sotomayor would grant the application to vacate stay in No. 21A85 and dissents from the dismissal of No. 21-588 as improvidently granted. | | |
|