SEARCH TIPS
Search term too short
Invalid text in search term. Try again
ADVANCED SEARCH
DOCKET SEARCH
Search
Toggle navigation
OPINIONS
Opinions of the Court
Opinions Relating to Orders
In-Chambers Opinions
U. S. Reports
Online Sources Cited in Opinions
Media Files Cited in Opinions
Case Citation Finder
FILING & RULES
Electronic Filing
Rules and Guidance
Supreme Court Bar
ORAL ARGUMENTS
Argument Transcripts
Argument Audio
Calendars and Lists
Courtroom Seating
CASE DOCUMENTS
Docket Search
Orders of the Court
Orders by Circuit
Granted/Noted Cases List
Journal
NEWS MEDIA
Services for News Media
Press Releases
Media Advisories
Press Credentials
Speeches
A Reporter's Guide to Applications
Chief Justice's Year-End Reports on the Federal Judiciary
ABOUT THE COURT
Justices
Supreme Court at Work
Code of Conduct for Justices
History and Traditions
The Supreme Court Building
Visiting the Court
Activities for Students & Families
Exhibitions
Building Regulations
Frequently Asked Questions
Home
>
Search Results
260 items found. Page: 1 of 38 for your search: Chevron
<< First
< Previous
Next >
Last >>
Search Results:
QPReport
own statutory jurisdiction should be evaluated under
Chevron
, did the Fifth Circuit improperly apply
Chevron
? 3. Did the FCC usurp the jurisdiction and
QPReport
not yet conclusively resolved the question of whether
Chevron
applies in the context of an agency's this Court's guidance, a court should apply
Chevron
to review an agency's determination of its own
QPReport
the District Court from engaging in a
Chevron
analysis, and that the District Court was required to of jurisdiction to engage in a traditional
Chevron
analysis and require automatic deference to an
19-296 Guedes v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (03/02/2020)
This Court has often declined to apply
Chevron
deference when the government fails to invoke it. See in part). That obligation went unfulfilled here.
Chevron’s
application in this case may be doubtful
21-972 Buffington v. McDonough (11/07/22)
Given that asserted ambiguity, the court invoked
Chevron
U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Greenberg contended that themajority’s invocation of
Chevron
was “nothing more than arubber stamping
QPReport
Federal Circuit erred in failing to accord
Chevron
deference to that construction, when a contrary
19-402 Baldwin v. United States (02/24/2020)
My skepticism of Brand X begins at its foundation—
Chevron
deference. In 1984, a bare quorum of six Justicesdecided
Chevron
. The Court reasoned that “if [a] statute issilent
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
##LOC[Cancel]##