Supreme Court of the United States
Skip Navigation LinksHome > Search Results



Docket for 09-350
No. 09-350
Title:
Los Angeles County, California, Petitioner
v.
Craig Arthur Humphries, et al.
Docketed:September 23, 2009
Lower Ct:United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
  Case Nos.:(05-56467)
  Decision Date:June 22, 2009
Questions Presented

~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings  and  Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sep 21 2009 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 23, 2009)
Oct 23 2009 Order extending time to file response to petition to and including November 23, 2009.
Nov 23 2009 Brief of respondent Craig Arthur Humphries, and Wendy Dawn Aborn Humphries in opposition filed.
Dec 4 2009 Reply of petitioner County of Los Angeles, California filed.
Dec 9 2009 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 8, 2010.
Jan 11 2010 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 15, 2010.
Jan 19 2010 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 22, 2010.
Feb 16 2010 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 19, 2010.
Feb 22 2010 Petition GRANTED limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.
Mar 10 2010 Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner County of Los Angeles, California.
Mar 22 2010 Motion to dispense with printing the joint appendix filed by petitioner GRANTED.
Mar 29 2010 The time within which to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including April 23, 2010.
Apr 23 2010 Brief of petitioner County of Los Angeles, California filed.
May 14 2010 The time within which to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including June 21, 2010.
Jun 17 2010 The time within which to file respondents' brief on the merits is further extended to and including June 28, 2010.
Jun 28 2010 Brief of respondents Craig Arthur Humphries, and Wendy Dawn Aborn Humphries filed.
Jul 20 2010 SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Tuesday, October 5, 2010.
Jul 26 2010 Record received from U.S.C.A. for 9th Circuit. (1 envelope)
Jul 28 2010 Reply of petitioner County of Los Angeles, California filed.
Jul 29 2010 CIRCULATED.
Jul 29 2010 Record received from U.S.D.C. for the Central District of CA. (2 boxes)
Sep 7 2010 Justice Kagan is recused in this case.
Oct 5 2010 Argued. For petitioner: Timothy T. Coates, Los Angeles, Cal. For respondents: Andrew J. Pincus, Washington, D. C.
Nov 30 2010 Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Breyer, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which all other Members joined, except Kagan, J., who took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Jan 3 2011 JUDGMENT ISSUED.
Jun 14 2011 Record returned to U..S.D.C. for Central District of California.



~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~    ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~   ~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioner:
Timothy T. Coates Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland LLP(310) 859-7811
    Counsel of Record5900 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Floor
Los Angeles, CA  90036
tcoates@gmsr.com
Party name: County of Los Angeles, California
Attorneys for Respondents:
Andrew J. Pincus Mayer Brown LLP(202) 263-3000
    Counsel of Record1999 K Street, NW
Washington, DC  20006-1101
apincus@mayerbrown.com
Party name: Craig Arthur Humphries, and Wendy Dawn Aborn Humphries

 

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 1 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20543