Supreme Court of the United States

Quick Links


Electronic Filing

Courtroom Seating

Fellows Program

Contact Us
Live Audio
Live Audio

Today at the Court - Monday, Feb 23, 2026

  • The Court will release an order list at 9:30 a.m.
  • The Court will convene for a public session in the Courtroom at 10 a.m. The Justices will hear two oral arguments. An audio feed will be live-streamed, and the audio will be available on the Court's website later in the day.
  • Seating for the oral argument session will be provided to the public, members of the Supreme Court Bar, and press. The three-minute line will be temporarily suspended. The Supreme Court Building will be otherwise closed to the public.
  • The Supreme Court Building will reopen to the public following the conclusion of the Court session and close at 3 p.m.
Calendar
Title and navigation
Title and navigation
<<<February 2026><<
February 2026
SMTWTFS
       
1234567
891011121314
15
 
171819
 
21
22232425262728
       
Calendar Info/Key

 


Oral Arguments

Week of Monday, February 23


Monday, February 23
       
Havana Docks Corp. v. Royal Caribbean Cruises (24-983)
       
Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Corporación Cimex, S.A. (24-699)


Tuesday, February 24
       
Enbridge Energy, LP v. Nessel (24-783)


Wednesday, February 25
       
Pung v. Isabella County (25-95)

 

The audio recordings and transcripts of all oral arguments heard by the Supreme Court of the United States are posted on this website on the same day an argument is heard by the Court. Same-day transcripts are considered official but subject to final review.


Earlier Transcripts | Earlier Audio

Recent Decisions


February 20, 2026
         
Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump (24-1287)
The International Emergency Economic Powers Act, 91 Stat. 1626, does not authorize the President to impose tariffs.



January 26, 2026
       
Klein v. Martin (25-51) (Per Curiam)
Because the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the award of a new trial based on reasoning that departed from the strict standards that govern the grant of federal habeas relief to prisoners convicted in state court prescribed by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, the Court grants the State’s petition for a writ of certiorari and reverses the judgment below.



January 20, 2026
         
Berk v. Choy (24-440)
Delaware law requiring a plaintiff suing for medical malpractice to provide an affidavit from a medical professional attesting to the suit’s merit, Del. Code, Tit. 18, §6853(a)(1), conflicts with a valid Federal Rule of Civil Procedure and does not apply in federal court.

         
Ellingburg v. United States (24-482)
Restitution under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996 is criminal punishment for purposes of the Ex Post Facto Clause.

         
Coney Island Auto Parts Unlimited, Inc. v. Burton (24-808)
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(c)(1)’s reasonable-time limit applies to a motion alleging that a judgment is void under Rule 60(b)(4).



More Opinions...

Did You Know...

Chisholm v. Georgia


February 18 marked the 233rd anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in Chisholm  v. Georgia, where the Court allowed a citizen from one state to sue another state in federal court. The 4–1 decision spurred Congress to pass and the states to ratify the Eleventh Amendment in 1795 to eliminate federal court jurisdiction over such suits. This became the first time a Court decision was overturned by a constitutional amendment.

In 1908, the Court decided Ex Parte Young, which allowed suits in federal courts for injunctions against state officials when the state acted contrary to federal law.

 

1 / 2
Title page of a pamphlet copy of Chisholm v. Georgia, 1793. It was “Printed by T. Dobson, at the Stone-House” on South Second Street in Philadelphia. Early Supreme Court decisions were largely published in newspapers, but the interest in Chisholm likely led to it being what is thought to be the one of the earliest Supreme Court cases printed for distribution in pamphlet form.
Title page of a pamphlet copy of Chisholm  v. Georgia, 1793. It was “Printed by T. Dobson, at the Stone-House” on South Second Street in Philadelphia. Early Supreme Court decisions were largely published in newspapers, but the interest in Chisholm likely led to it being what is thought to be one of the earliest Supreme Court cases printed for distribution in pamphlet form.
Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States
Click on the arrows or dots to see the next photograph.
2 / 2
The Supreme Court heard Chisholm v. Georgia in the Mayor’s Court courtroom in Philadelphia’s City Hall, the Court’s temporary home from 1791 until 1800 when Philadelphia was the seat of the federal government.
The Supreme Court heard Chisholm  v. Georgia in the Mayor’s Court courtroom in Philadelphia’s City Hall, the Court’s temporary home from 1791 until 1800 when Philadelphia was the seat of the federal government.
Franz Jantzen, Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States
Click on the arrows or dots to see the next photograph.
Opinions
Filing & Rules
Oral Arguments
Case Documents
News Media
About
Visit
Contact Us | Site Map | Help | Fellows Program | Jobs | Links | Website Policies and Notices | Privacy Policy | USA.GOV
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 1 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20543