No. 22A17 | |
Title: | United States, et al., Applicants v. Texas, et al. |
Docketed: | July 8, 2022 |
Linked with 22-58 | |
Lower Ct: | United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit |
Case Numbers: | (22-40367) |
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
Jul 08 2022 | Application (22A17) for a stay, submitted to Justice Alito. |
Main DocumentLower Court Orders/OpinionsProof of Service | |
Jul 08 2022 | Response to application (22A17) requested by Justice Alito, due 5 p.m. (EDT), July 13, 2022. |
Jul 13 2022 | Response to application from respondents Texas, et al. filed. |
Main DocumentProof of Service | |
Jul 13 2022 | Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Arizona, Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Indiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming. |
Main DocumentProof of Service | |
Jul 13 2022 | Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Professor Stephen I. Vladeck. |
Main DocumentProof of Service | |
Jul 13 2022 | Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Immigration Reform Law Institute. |
Main Document | |
Jul 14 2022 | Reply of applicants United States, et al. filed. |
Proof of ServiceReply | |
Jul 21 2022 | Application (22A17) referred to the Court. |
Jul 21 2022 | Application (22A17) denied by the Court. The application for stay presented to Justice Alito and by him referred to the Court is denied. The Solicitor General suggested that the Court may want to construe the application as a petition for certiorari before judgment. Doing so, the petition is granted. The parties are directed to brief and argue the following questions: 1. Whether the state plaintiffs have Article III standing to challenge the Department of Homeland Security’s Guidelines for the Enforcement of Civil Immigration Law; 2. Whether the Guidelines are contrary to 8 U.S.C. §1226(c) or 8 U.S.C. §1231(a), or otherwise violate the Administrative Procedure Act; and 3. Whether 8 U.S.C. §1252(f)(1) prevents the entry of an order to “hold unlawful and set aside” the Guidelines under 5 U.S.C. §706(2). The case will be set for argument in the first week of the December 2022 argument session. Justice Sotomayor, Justice Kagan, Justice Barrett, and Justice Jackson would grant the application for stay. |
NAME | ADDRESS | PHONE |
Attorneys for Petitioners | ||
Elizabeth B. Prelogar Counsel of Record | Solicitor General United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530-0001 SupremeCtBriefs@USDOJ.gov | 202-514-2217 |
Party name: United States, et al. | ||
Attorneys for Respondent | ||
Judd Edward Stone II Counsel of Record | Texas Attorney General's Office P.O. Box 12548 (MC 059) Austin, TX 78711-2548 judd.stone@oag.texas.gov | 512-936-1700 |
Party name: State of Texas, et al. | ||
Other | ||
Drew Curtis Ensign Counsel of Record | Office of the Attorney General 2005 N. Central Avenue Phoenix, AZ 85004 drew.ensign@azag.gov | 602-542-5025 |
Party name: States of Arizona, Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Indiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming | ||
Lindsay C. Harrison Counsel of Record | Jenner & Block, LLP 1099 New York Avenue, NW Suite 900 Washington, DC 20001 LHarrison@jenner.com | (202)-639-6000 |
Party name: Professor Stephen I. Vladeck | ||
Lawrence J. Joseph Counsel of Record | Law Office of Lawrence J. Joseph 1250 Connecticut Avenue, NW Suite 700-1A Washington, DC 20036 ljoseph@larryjoseph.com | 2023559452 |
Party name: Immigration Reform Law Institute |