No. 20-1212 | |
Title: | Peyman Pakdel, et ux., Petitioners v. City and County of San Francisco, California, et al. |
Docketed: | March 3, 2021 |
Lower Ct: | United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit |
Case Numbers: | (17-17504) |
Decision Date: | March 17, 2020 |
Rehearing Denied: | October 13, 2020 |
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
Feb 26 2021 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 2, 2021) |
PetitionAppendixCertificate of Word CountProof of Service | |
Mar 04 2021 | Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Peyman Pakdel, et al. |
Blanket Consent | |
Mar 18 2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 2, 2021 to May 3, 2021, submitted to The Clerk. |
Main Document | |
Mar 23 2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 3, 2021. |
Apr 01 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Southeastern Legal Foundation; National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center; Texas Public Policy Foundation filed. |
Main DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word Count | |
Apr 01 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Pelican Institute for Public Policy filed. |
Main DocumentCertificate of Word CountProof of Service | |
Apr 02 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of The Cato Institute filed. |
Main DocumentCertificate of Word CountProof of Service | |
May 03 2021 | Brief of respondents City and County of San Francisco, et al. in opposition filed. |
Main DocumentProof of ServiceCertificate of Word Count | |
May 14 2021 | Reply of petitioners Peyman Pakdel, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
Main DocumentCertificate of Word CountProof of Service | |
May 18 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/3/2021. |
Jun 01 2021 | Rescheduled. |
Jun 07 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/10/2021. |
Jun 08 2021 | Rescheduled. |
Jun 14 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021. |
Jun 21 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021. |
Jun 28 2021 | Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Court. Opinion per curiam. (Detached Opinion) |
Jul 30 2021 | JUDGMENT ISSUED. |
NAME | ADDRESS | PHONE |
Attorneys for Petitioners | ||
Jeffrey Wilson McCoy Counsel of Record | Pacific Legal Foundation 930 G Street Sacramento, CA 95814 jmccoy@pacificlegal.org | 916-419-7111 |
Party name: Peyman Pakdel, et al. | ||
Attorneys for Respondents | ||
Kristen Ann Jensen Counsel of Record | Office of the San Francisco City Attorney 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, City Hall, Room 234 San Francisco, CA 94102-4682 kristen.jensen@sfcityatty.org | 4153101103 |
Party name: City and County of San Francisco, et al. | ||
Kristen A. Jensen | Office of the City Attorney 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Pl., Rm. 234 San Francisco, CA 94102-4682 kristen.jensen@sfgov.org | (415) 554-4615 |
Party name: City and County of San Francisco, et al. | ||
Other | ||
Sarah Elizabeth Roy Harbison Counsel of Record | Pelican Instititue for Public Policy 400 Poydras St., Suite 900 New Orleans, LA 70130 sarah@pelicaninstitute.org | 5049528016 |
Party name: Pelican Institute for Public Policy | ||
Kimberly Stewart Hermann Counsel of Record | Southeastern Legal Foundation 560 W. Crossville Rd. Suite 104 Roswell, GA 30075-7509 khermann@southeasternlegal.org | 770-977-2131 |
Party name: Southeastern Legal Foundation; National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center; Texas Public Policy Foundation | ||
Ilya Shapiro Counsel of Record | Cato Institute 1000 Massachusetts Ave., NW Washington, DC 20001 ishapiro@cato.org | 2028420200 |
Party name: The Cato Institute |