Search Results:

 18-956 Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc. (04/05/2021)
linesare copyrightable. After a jury then found for Google on fair use, the Federal Circuit reversed, concluding that Google’s copying was not a fair use as a

 QPReport
21-1333 GONZALEZ V. GOOGLE LLC DECISION BELOW: 2 F.4th 871 CERT. GRANTED 10/3/2022 QUESTION an "interactive computer service" (such as YouTube, Google, Facebook and Twitter) for "publish[ing

 593us1r26_f29g.pdf
are copyrightable. After a jury then found for Google on fair use, the Federal Circuit reversed, concluding that Google's copying was not a fair use as a

 QuestionsReport
a debtor claims an exemption using a specific dollar amount that is equal to the value placed on the where the statute contains specific dollar-value limitations? LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: 06-4290

 QuestionsReport
a lawful permanent resident under Section 101(a)(43)(M)(i) of the Immigration & Nationality Act of 1952 as amended (the ''Act''), 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43) (M)(i) when he was not convicted of the

 QPReport
TO OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE,” 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(43)(S), MUST A PREDICATE OFFENSE REQUIRE A NEXUS WITH relating to obstruction of justice," 8 U.S.C. 110l(a)(43)(S). LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: 19-72779

 17-961 Frank v. Gaos (03/20/2019)
webpage by searching forparticular terms on Google’s website. Paloma Gaos challenged Google’s use of referrer headers. She filed a