June 26, 2024
Murthy v. Missouri (23-411)
Respondents—two States and five individual social-media users who sued Executive Branch officials and agencies, alleging that the Government pressured the platforms to censor their speech in violation of the First Amendment—lack Article III standing to seek an injunction.
Snyder v. United States (23-108)
Federal law, 18 U. S. C. §666, proscribes bribes to state and local officials but does not make it a crime for those officials to accept gratuities for their past acts.
June 21, 2024
Texas v. New Mexico (141, Orig.)
The motion to enter a proposed consent decree that would dispose of the United States’ claims in the Rio Grande Compact without its consent is denied.
Department of State v. Munoz (23-334)
A U. S. citizen does not have a fundamental liberty interest in her noncitizen spouse being admitted to the country.
Erlinger v. United States (23-370)
The Fifth and Sixth Amendments require a unanimous jury to make the determination beyond a reasonable doubt that a defendant’s past offenses were committed on separate occasions for purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U. S. C. § §924(e)(1).
Smith v. Arizona (22-899)
When an expert conveys an absent lab analyst’s statements in support of the expert’s opinion, and the statements provide that support only if true, then the statements come into evidence for their truth, and thus implicate the Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause.
United States v. Rahimi (22-915)
When an individual has been found by a court to pose a credible threat to the physical safety of another, that individual may be temporarily disarmed consistent with the Second Amendment.