Docket for 14-282
| No. 14-282 | |
| Title: |
| Tavares Chandler, Petitioner |
| v. |
| United States |
|
| Docketed: | September 10, 2014 |
| Lower Ct: | United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit |
| Case Nos.: | (12-10331) |
| Decision Date: | February 20, 2014 |
| Rehearing Denied: | June 9, 2014 |
| ~~~Date~~~ | ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| Sep 8 2014 |
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 10, 2014) |
| Sep 30 2014 |
Order extending time to file response to petition to and including November 10, 2014. |
| Oct 10 2014 |
Brief amicus curiae of The Sentencing Project filed. |
| Nov 7 2014 |
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed. |
| Nov 24 2014 |
Reply of petitioner Tavares Chandler filed. (Distributed) |
| Nov 25 2014 |
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 12, 2014. |
| Jun 25 2015 |
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 29, 2015. |
| Jun 30 2015 |
Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Johnson v. United States, 576 U. S. ___ (2015). Justice Alito concurring in the decision to grant, vacate, and remand in this case. Following the recommendation of the Solicitor General, the Court has held the petition in this and many other cases pending the decision in Johnson v. United States, 576 U. S. ____ (2015). In holding these petitions and now in vacating and remanding the decisions below in these cases, the Court has not differentiated between cases in which the petitioners would be entitled to relief if the Court held (as it now has) that the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act of 1984, 18 U. S. C. Sec. 924(e)(2)(B)(ii), is void for vagueness and cases in which relief would not be warranted for a procedural reason. On remand, the Court of Appeals should understand that the Court's disposition of this petition does not reflect any view regarding petitioner's entitlement to relief. |
| Aug 3 2015 |
JUDGMENT ISSUED. |
|